Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Copy Cats

Two things amaze me about this stuff. One is that a few (allegedly) lifted passages in a couple of decades-old papers are the cause of such an uproar. And the second is why anyone writing a master thesis or a doctorate dissertation would feel compelled to plagiarize when they are already putting so much work into their projects. It’s not that much extra effort to attribute passages or at least reword them well enough to make it seem like your own work.

The cautionary tale being told, I suppose, is that plagiarism is becoming easier to spot, so don’t even try it. Right now, I bet Glenn Poshard is wishing he could go back and put in a few extra hours to do it right.

Full Disclosure: I've never written a master thesis or a doctorate dissertation but I do write a blog! And that, of course, qulifies me to comment on -or even plagiarize- anything.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Poshard said he was not worried about losing his Ph.D. He acknowledged he needed the degree to get the $300,000-a-year job as president but said he never used the degree for political gain in his years in the state Senate and U.S. House.
'
"Plagiarism in a doctoral dissertation is not something that goes away once the dissertation has been accepted by the candidate's university: the scholar is always answerable for his or her work. And the nature and extent of the plagiarism in Glenn Poshard's thesis are *not* excusable on the grounds that there were no word processors 24 years ago! The kinds of copying evident in Poshard's dissertation have never been acceptable among scholars. The fact that SIU folk seem so ready to defend Poshard suggests to me that there is no real commitment to excellence there. At best, his academic work was worse than mediocre. "''

Shalom,

--- Prof. Leland Milton Goldblatt